Tuesday, September 11, 2007

9/11 Anniversary, 6 years today



Today is the anniversary of 9/11. Some key things to contemplate as you go through life today.
  • Those responsible - Al-Qaeda With center of gravity in Pakistan have an area of operation around the world, specifically: Afghanistan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, United States, United Kingdom, Indonesia, Philippines, Jordan, Kuwait, Iran, Chechnya.

  • State Sponsors - Formerly Sudan, Formerly Afghanistan. Not Iraq.

  • Al-Qaeda's goal - To spread militant Sunni Islam worldwide

  • Leader of Al-Qaeda - Osama bin Laden (full given name Osama bin Muhammad bin Awad bin Laden) a Saudi was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. He is 50 years old, born 1957, is 6'5" tall at 160 pounds.

  • Osama bin Laden's history - Veteran of Afghanistan-Soviet civil war (1980-1989). 9/11 Attack on the Twin Towers in NY 2001 with a death toll 2,973 . Two East African US Embassy Bombings in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania in 1998. The FBI says 213 died at Nairobi, plus 12 at Tanzania, for a total of 225.


Who and what is Al-Qaeda? source

1) Al-Qaeda was formed in 1988 by veterans of the anti-Soviet civil war in Afghanistan, with the purpose of exporting the victory worldwide. At its core was Azzam and his deputy, bin Laden, who may have differed how best to proceed.

When Azzam was killed in 1989, bin Laden assumed full control of the organization.Though he was a Saudi, most of his senior leadership was Egyptian. Between 1991 and 1996, al-Qaeda was headquarted in Sudan, where it enjoyed friendly relations with the governing National Islamic Front. International pressure forced bin Laden to relocate back to Afghanistan in 1996, where it allied with the then-nascent Taliban. In late 2001, most of its training camps were destroyed, and the group became somewhat diffuse, with much of its leadership relocating either to Iran, the mountainous region along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, or to Pakistan's cities.

Many of those work in Pakistan's cities were caught. The status of the leadership in Iran remains unclear. Al-Qaeda's purpose is to spread jihad worldwide through a number of means, including funding and training Islamic and ethnic guerilla movements, issuing propaganda aimed at inspiring freelance jihadists to commit acts of terrorism, and organizating and conducting complex attacks on countries it sees opposing it. The organization is funded largely by charitable donations, some intended, and some diverted by symathizers from poorly managed Gulf charities. Before 9-11, the organization had an estimated annual budget of about $30 million.

2) Al-Qaeda (Translated from Arabic: The Base) is an international alliance of militant Sunni jihadist organizations. Its roots can be traced back to Osama bin Laden and others around the time of the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989. Al-Qaeda's objectives include the end of foreign influence in Muslim countries and the creation of a new Islamic caliphate.


Al-Qaeda has been labeled a terrorist organization...Its affiliates have executed attacks against targets in various countries, the most prominent being the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and Northern Virginia. Following the September 11 attacks, the United States government launched a broad military and intelligence campaign known as the War on Terrorism, with the stated aim of dismantling al-Qaeda and killing or capturing its operatives.

Due to its structure of semi-autonomous cells, al-Qaeda's size and degree of responsibility for particular attacks are difficult to establish. However, this may also be because its size and degree are exaggerated. Although the governments opposed to al-Qaeda claim that it has worldwide reach, other analysts have suggested that those governments, as well as Osama bin Laden himself, exaggerate al-Qaeda's significance in Islamist terrorism. The neologism"al-Qaedaism" is applied to the wider context of those who independently conduct similar acts through political sympathy to al-Qaeda ideology or methods or the copycat effect.

This part is important...
Following the Soviet Union's withdrawal from Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia. The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990 had put the country of Saudi Arabia and its ruling House of Saud at risk as Saudi's most valuable oil fields (Hama) were within easy striking distance of Iraqi forces in Kuwait, and Saddam's call to pan-Arab/Islamism could potentially rally internal dissent.

In the face of a seemingly massive Iraqi military presence, Saudi Arabia's own forces were well armed but far outnumbered. Bin Laden offered the services of his mujahedeen to King Fahd to protect Saudi Arabia from the Iraqi army.

The Saudi monarch refused bin Laden's offer, opting instead to allow U.S. and allied forces to deploy on Saudi territory. The deployment angered Bin Laden, as he believed the presence of foreign troops in the "land of the two mosques" (Mecca and Medina) profaned sacred soil. After speaking publicly against the Saudi government for harboring American troops, he was quickly forced into exile to Sudan and on April 9, 1994 his Saudi citizenship was revoked. His family publicly disowned him. There is controversy over whether and to what extent he continued to garner support from members of his family and/or the Saudi government.

Shortly afterwards, the movement that came to be known as al-Qaeda was formed.

This is the issue that Osama bin Laden has with the United States. It is not because they "hate our freedom." It is not because "he wants to terrorize Christians." It is because he doesn't like us in his home land territory.

Yes, Saddam was a brutal and bloody dictator. But that was never the issue. Saddam and Iraq and Osama/Al-Qaeda are two seperate entities. Iraq did not attack the United States.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Actually Iraq has had several incidents which could be considered attacks on the US.

Saddam did try to assassinate George H.W. Bush in the mid 90's. This included on top of a consistent defiance with UN weapons inspectors and consistent attempts to buy illegal weapons or technology.

His military also broke no-fly, no-drive sanctions regularly while also locking radar on U.S., NATO, and UN aircraft.

Locking radar is an act of aggression. An act that allowed for a return show of force.

For years a week didn't pass where we weren't dropping live ammunition on Iraqis. When I served in Saudi Arabia in support our planes took off loaded and came back empty almost everyday. Under Bill Clinton we dropped munitions and killed Iraqis daily. Just from a distance.

Saddam also gave money to the families of suicide bombers and directly invested in terrorist organizations. Though he had no direct connection with Bin Laden he supported terrorists with cash directly.

This being the background motivation which justified and motivated NATO. Within this coalition Hillary Clinton, Joe Bidden, and several other democrats were huge supporters of this invasion.

I guess they must be neocon hill-billies huh? Us hill-billies all in opposition to dictators who execute campaigns of genocide and who have histories of dropping nerve gas on civilians.

I guess you are right. There was no real reason at all to invade Iraq. No Osama no logical reason to even consider Iraq a threat.

Unknown said...

Actually you are confusing the two. We invaded Iraq (as we were already involved in a continuous containment with him since 1991) because he was a rogue nation.

Consistently George Bush, Hillary Clinton, Tony Blair, and many many many outspoken others talked about a general unified war on all terror. This war on terror included the drug trade in South America, the IRA in the UK, Hamas in Syria, the PLO in Palestein and a host of other non Al Qaeda terror organizations.

I realize Al Franken and Noam Chomsky attempt to tell you different but they are just skewing the facts to connect it with their world view. Al Qeada was the buzz word but the War on Terror included all terror and all nations.

Read reliable sources (the NY Times, Foreign Policy, the Washington Post) about the last five years and they will tell you I'm right. The big case for Iraq was Collin Powel's presentation to the UN for preemptive action in which NATO was unaminous in support.

Are you saying this was a lie put forward to the world by Nato, Clinton, McCain, Blair and George W. Bush???

And I would disagree with two other of your other assertions.

1) Saddam Hussein did not deserve to die. He deserved to be brought to justice and I personal have issues with the death penalty.

2) I am no neocon. As you proved in another thread you don't even know what a neocon is.